📑 Table of Contents
📊 Token usage: estimated from retrieval and writing scale.
Covers the latest AI research, open source and industry moves, updated daily.
Editor’s Note
The paper thread today: CyberGym-E2E benchmarks end-to-end cybersecurity agents, the Meta-Agent Challenge asks whether agents can develop agents, SCI-PRM brings tool-aware process rewards to scientific verification, and LongDS-Bench exposes long-horizon agentic data-analysis failures.
1. Latest arXiv Papers
-
CyberGym-E2E: Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents’ End-to-End Cybersecurity Capabilities — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04460
-
AICompanionBench: Benchmarking LLMs-as-Judges for AI Companion Safety — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04867
-
The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development? — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04455
-
Plan First, Judge Later, Run Better: A DMAIC-Inspired Agentic System for Industrial Anomaly Detection — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04599
-
SCI-PRM: A Tool-Aware Process Reward Model for Scientific Reasoning Verification — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04579
-
Does Artificial Intelligence Advance Science? — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05118
-
Who Needs Labels? Adapting Vision Foundation Models with the Metadata You Already Have — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05107
-
LongDS-Bench: On the Failure of Long-Horizon Agentic Data Analysis — https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30434
Join the discussion
Comments powered by GitHub Discussions, stored in the hackcv/blog repo; sign in with a GitHub account to join. Markdown and emoji supported.Comments powered by GitHub Discussions, stored in the hackcv/blog repo; sign in with a GitHub account to join. Markdown and emoji supported.